Friday, August 24, 2012

India “EXCISE TAX” and “INDIA LOCALIZATION in Oracle”

Explain “Excise” and related taxes Fundamental concept & how excise works…

to this article:-
  • People who wish to get a generic idea on what “Excise” Tax and related topics are all about.
  • Oracle consultants who wish to implement modules generally referred to as “India Localization” – and these are mostly software modules which involve recording and calculating taxes that a manufacturing organization has got to pay to the concerned authorities.
Just thought that I shall try and explain Excise Tax and related stuff in a generic way….. probably just try and explain the fundamental concept involved in it…..

Explanation:-
Let’s consider that there’s a manufacturing plant located close to your home, and they’re manufacturing a discrete product called “Finished Good”, or “FG” in short.

This FG that they manufacture is made using an item called “Raw Material”, or “RM” in short.

They perform a few operations on RM, and these operations convert this RM into FG. A simple representation of the same is as in this figure below:-


Manufacturing Plant










Buy RM __________ Perform some operation on RM and Convert it to FG __________ Sell FG








The obvious first step will be to buy RM ...
  • Let’s say that exactly 1 unit of FG needs to be manufactured. So, for doing this, the first activity that the manufacturing plant needs to do is buy exactly 1 unit of RM .
  • To be able to easily convert numbers into percentages, I’ll assume that the “assessable cost” of 1 unit of RM is Rs 100/-.
  • What do I mean by assessable cost?
    It can be described as the price that the supplier of RM wants to receive and keep for himself end of the day. The assessable price is the price which is absolutely free from any form of tax. Whatever tax needs to be calculated and paid, will be done so by considering this Rs 100/- as the base price.
  • Now, these two items that I’ve defined as RM and FG are “Excisable Items”. This means that a government authority called “Excise Authority.. “ already have a rule defined in their rule book which states that items RM and FG are standard items, and they would charge a tax on these two items called “Excise Duty”.
    (Kindly note that all the numbers I’ve considered here are generic and are used only to explain a concept. The actual percentage of the tax could be different.)
Coming back to buying/ procuring of RM from the supplier, here below is a list of taxes that will be charged on it’s assessable cost of Rs 100/- per unit:-
  1. Basic Excise Duty (B.E.D) = 10% of Assessable Cost.
  2. Higher Education Cess (H.E.C) = 2% of Basic Excise Duty.
  3. Secondary Higher Education Cess (S.H.E.C) = 1% of Basic Excise Duty.
All three above taxes that I’ve defined are “Excise Taxes”. It’s just that they’re split into 3 components. Apart from this, generally there are about one or two more taxes which are known as VAT and CST.

VAT and CST are not “Excise” taxes. In general, VAT is a tax charged by the State Government and CST is a tax charged by the central government. . For simplicity purpose, we’ll forget them for now. As of now, I’ll consider all other taxes like VAT, CST, etc as non -existent. We’ll consider that, only the three taxes that I’ve mentioned above, are there.


When the Manufacturing Plant purchases 1 unit of RM from their supplier, they would receive a Bill which looks similar to this:- 
XXX Supplier
Sl No: Item Name Qty Cost Currency
1 RM 1 100 INR
2 10% Basic Excise Duty
10 INR
3 2% Higher Edu. Cess
0.2 INR
4 1% Sec. Higher Edu. Cess
0.1 INR






Total Bill Amount
110.3 INR

I believe the view of this bill is self explanatory. However, to prevent any sort of confusion, here's an explanation of the same:-
Cost of RM ("assessable value") = Rs 100/-
10% Basic Excise Duty is applied on Assessable value = 10% of Rs 100/- = Rs 10/-
2% Higher Edu. Cess is applied on the Basic Excise Duty = 2% of Rs 10/- = Rs 0.2/-
1% Sec. Higher Edu. Cess is applied, 
again on the Basic Excise Duty = 1% of Rs 10/-  = Rs 0.1/-

So, the Total amount that the manufacturing plant is paying = Rs ( 100 + 10 + 0.2 + 0.1) = Rs 110.3/-

As you can see, out of Rs 110.3/-, Rs 10.3 is “excise tax” and Rs 100/- is the price of RM. But here, when the manufacturing plant is paying the above bill, they’d pay the full amount of Rs 110.3/- to the supplier. The point I’m trying to drive is, the manufacturing plant cannot tell the supplier that they’ll pay them Rs 100/- and pay up the remaining amount of Rs 10.3/- directly to the Excise Department. The manufacturing plant has got to trust the supplier that the Rs 10.3/- which he is paying to the supplier will in turn be paid to the “Excise Authority… “ by the supplier.

Now, considering that the purchase of RM by the manufacturing plant is completed, let’s assume that they take about 3 days to perform the required operations to convert RM into a FG. So, 3 days later, the FG is ready. Again, the process repeats. The manufacturing plant does their mathematics and decides that their “assessable cost” of FG is Rs 200/- (let’s assume for calculation purposes… ).

They’ve also found a customer who has found this “assessable” price of Rs 200/- to be competitive in the market and has decided to purchase it for this price.

As I said, the process repeats. The manufacturer sells the FG to their customer and gives them a bill which looks similar to the figure below:-

FG Manufacturer
Sl No. Item Name Qty Cost Currency
1 FG 1 200 INR
2 10% Basic Excise Duty
20 INR
3 2% Higher Edu. Cess
0.4 INR
4 1% Sec. Higher Edu. Cess
0.2 INR






Total Bill Amount
220.6 INR

Now, the price that the customer pays to “FG Manufacturer Ltd.” is Rs 220.6/-. And out of this, Rs 20.6/- is the “Excise Tax”.

All apologies for being repetitive, but again, as you can see, this Rs 20.6/- is collected from the customer by the manufacturing plant. The end customer has just got to trust that the manufacturing plant pays up this money to the “Excise Authority.. “.

Whenever such buying of RM and selling of FG happens, it gets recorded as “transactions” by the accounts department of the manufacturing plant. Here, in this above example of a purchase of RM and a sale of FG, a total of two transactions have happened. To simplify things, I’ll assume that these two transactions are the only transactions that have happened in a duration of 1 month. (assume… )

In this case, the accounts department of the manufacturing plant will have recorded all the tax related transactions as shown in the tables below:-
Records of “Basic Excise Duty”:-     
  
Basic Excise Duty
Paid (while purchasing items)
Received (while selling items)
Date Item Name Qty Amount Currency Date Item Name Qty Amount Currency
dd/mm/yy RM 1 10 INR dd/mm/yy FG 1 20 INR










Total Paid Amount 10 INR Total Recieved Amount 20 INR

Records of “Higher Education Cess”:-

Higher Education cess
Paid (while purchasing items)
Received (while selling items)
Date Item Name Qty Amount Currency Date Item Name Qty Amount Currency
dd/mm/yy RM 1 0.2 INR dd/mm/yy FG 1 0.4 INR










Total Paid Amount 0.2 INR Total Recieved Amount 0.4 INR

Records of “secondary Higher Education Cess”:-

Secondary Higher Education cess
Paid (while purchasing items)
Received (while selling items)
Date Item Name Qty Amount Currency Date Item Name Qty Amount Currency
dd/mm/yy RM 1 0.1 INR dd/mm/yy FG 1 0.2 INR










Total Paid Amount 0.1 INR Total Recieved Amount 0.2 INR

Consider the “Basic Excise Duty” Table:-
Transactions like these keep getting recorded as and when they take place. At the end of a fixed period, lets say, 1 month, the manufacturing company has a record of “Total Paid Amount” and “Total Received Amount” in each category. This is the time when they decide to pay up the money they’ve collected as “taxes” from their customers.

Excise Duty” = (Basic Excise Duty) + (Higher Education Cess) + (Secondary Higher Education Cess);

Now, whatever I’m going to explain from here on is what this article is really all about. I shall use “Example Scenarios” to explain the concept:-

SCENARIO 1 :-

If we look at the “Basic Excise Duty” table, the “Total Received Amount” here is Rs 20/-. The “Total Received Amount” is essentially the amount received as tax by the manufacturing plant from the customer whenever they made a sale.

The next activity that the manufacturing company does, at the end of the month is send a cheque of Rs 20.6/- to the “Excise Authority.. “ . The amount is Rs 20.6/- since, out of Rs 220.6/- , this amount of Rs 20.6/- was collected as “Excise Duty” to pay to the “Excise Authority.. “. And so, they’re sincerely sending a cheque of Rs 20.6/- to the “Excise Authority..” .

But if you notice, there is something wrong with this numerical value of Rs 20.6/-.


What exactly is wrong?

Let me explain. According to me, if the manufacturing plant sends a cheque amount of Rs 20.6/- to the “Excise Authority.. “ , then in my view, the “Excise Authority.. “ has acted very smart and has actually collected a total of Rs 30.9/- as “Excise Duty” for this particular product called “FG”. And Rs 30/- as “Excise Duty” for a product (FG) with an “assessable cost” of Rs 200/-, essentially makes the “Excise Duty” equal to 15% of the “Assessable Cost”.

What makes me think that “Excise Authority.. “ acted smart and has actually collected 15% instead of 10% as “Excise Duty”?

FG contains an item called RM, and the manufacturing plant has already paid a tax called “Excise Duty” for this item called RM.
To elaborate, When the manufacturing plant purchased the item called “RM” for the purpose of manufacturing FG, the manufacturing plant paid Rs 10.3/- there itself as “Excise Duty”. Even though they made the payment to “ABC Supplier”, they paid it with a belief that Rs 10.3/- out of the Rs 110.3/- will in turn be paid by “ABC Supplier” as “Excise Duty” to the “Excise Authority.. “. This form of payment of tax is generally referred to as “Indirect Tax”. Now, how sincerely “ABC Supplier” goes ahead and pays this Rs 10.3/- to “Excise Authority.. “ is not really something that the manufacturing plant is interested in knowing.

If you are getting error from above scenario.

SCENARIO 2:-
  • At the end of 1 month, the manufacturing plant sends a cheque of Rs 10.3/- to “Excise authority.. “ to clear the total amount remaining to be paid as “Excise Duty”.
  • If you see and are able to automatically give the reason why sending Rs 10.3/- as “Excise Duty” to the “Excise Authority.. “ solves this tax problem, then Congratulations!! You’ve understood the concept!!
If any Finished Good that is manufactured, contains Raw Materials within it for which excise tax was paid during the purchase of Raw Materials, then those values of tax paid during the purchase of Raw Materials, can be subtracted from the total amount received as tax during sale of Finished Goods, and the value obtained on this subtraction, is the balance excise tax that the manufacturing plant has got to pay.”

I’ll admit that the above statement is slightly confusing. I looked at every possible way to simplify it, but I couldn’t. So I’ll come back to my FG and RM example to explain the above statement:-
In my above example, the customer who is buying 1 unit of FG is paid a total of Rs 220.6/- to buy it.

This FG purchased contains 1 unit of RM in it. The Manufacturing Plant paid a total of Rs 110.3/- to buy 1 unit of RM. When the manufacturing plant paid Rs 110.3/-, they took a bill which clearly stated that a total of Rs 10.3/- out of Rs 110.3/- was tax. So, the accounts department of the manufacturing plant concluded that they’ve already paid a tax of Rs 10.3/- . 
 The accounts department records it in their books and their computer.
Next, the manufacturing plant sold 1 unit of FG for a price of Rs 220.6/-. While doing this, the manufacturing plant gave a bill stating that Rs 20.6/- out of Rs 220.6/- is tax. So, the accounts department concludes that they now need to give a total of Rs 20.6/- as tax to concerned authorities. But then, they’ve already paid a tax of Rs 10.3/- while buying RM. So, the total amount remaining to be paid as tax, according to them, now is the value obtained when Rs 10.3/- is subtracted from Rs 20.6/-.
That is:-
Manufacturing Plant:-
Sl No. Description Amount
1 Tax to be paid due to sale of FG Rs 20.6/-
2 (minus) Tax already paid during purchase of RM Rs 10.3/-
3 Balance Tax to be paid Rs 10.3/-

So, now if the manufacturing plant pays Rs 10.3/- to the concerned authorities, they’re done with paying up all their taxes!!

1 comment:

  1. Anonymous4:17:00 PM

    Is there any one to help me to solve the following Indian Localization Issue

    Please Help


    Oracle Apps R12 India Localization

    Durring Ship Conferm it is giving "Warning" and giving following error log


    The Time Stamp this Entry is Created is 17/09/2014 12:34:02

    The Value of v_pref_rg23a is

    The Value of v_pref_rg23c is

    The Value of v_pref_pla is

    The Value of v_rg23a_balance is 0

    The Value of v_rg23c_balance is 0

    The Value of v_pla_balance is 63000

    The Value of v_ssi_unit_flag is Y

    The Value of v_tot_excise_amt is 10

    The Value of v_basic_pla_balance is 0

    The Value of v_additional_pla_balance is 0

    The Value of v_other_pla_balance is 0

    The Value of v_basic_excise_duty_amount is 10

    The Value of v_add_excise_duty_amount is 0

    The Value of v_oth_excise_duty_amount is 0

    The Value of v_export_oriented_unit is N

    The Value of v_register_code is DOMESTIC_EXCISE

    The Value of delivery id 24027

    The Value of organization id 123

    The Value of location id 145

    The Value of cess amount0

    The Value of sh cess amount0

    Call RG others check balances

    call RG others sh check balances

    call rg23 c check balances

    call rg 23 c sh check balances

    call pla check balances

    call pla sh check balances

    Other reg type ERROR

    None of the Register Have Balances Greater OR Equal TO the Excisable Amount ->10 OR Education Cess Amount => 0

    API Process_Stop_To_OM failed with an unexpected error

    The unexpected error is ORA-20001: APP--20110: ORA-20001: JAI_EXCEPTION_OCCURED

    (JAI_PROCESS_MSG=jai_om_wsh_prc_pkg.excise_balance_check.Err:ORA-20120: None of

    the Register Have Balances Greater OR Equal TO the Excisable Amount ->10 OR Edu

    UNEXPECTED ERROR IN Process_Stop_To_OM

    Unexpected error has occured. Oracle error message is ORA-20001: APP--20110: ORA-20001: JAI_EXCEPTION_OCCURED (JAI_PROCESS_MSG=jai_om_wsh_prc_pkg.excise_balance_check.Err:ORA-20120: None of the Register Have Balances Greater OR Equal TO the Excisable Amount ->10 OR Education C

    Arun Kr. Mukherjee
    arunm@metalogicsystems.com

    ReplyDelete






Please provide your valuable feedback ............